Wednesday, February 07, 2007

This is not new, but it's still a very good explanation of our tax system and very relevant after the last election.


This is a really good explanation of how “tax cuts” really work! Lets put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten men comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh $7.

The eighth $12.

The ninth $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

“Since you are all such good customers, “ he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20.

So, now the dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free.

But what about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his “fair share”? The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being PAID to eat their meal.

Finally, the restaurant owner suggested it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the sixth was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But, once outside of the restaurant, they began to compare their savings.

“I only got a dollar out of the $20,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man “but he got $10.

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a dollar too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than me!”

“That’s true!!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get $10 back when I only got $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison. “We didn’t get anything at all! The system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money to between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore. There are lots of good restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean if you don’t like the food in the United States.

5 comments:

Peder Rice said...

I'm about as fiscal a conservative as they come, but even then, I don't like this story.

It assumes that the poor will automatically feel cheated because they didn't get as big a tax break as the rich. However, they don't automatically feel cheated. Exploitation happens first.

Like, oh, I don't know, Henry Ford's breaking up of unions, the food horror stories of The Jungle, Haliburton doing business in Iran, corporate welfare, and sales and social security taxes that have ceilings that protect the rich.

So the rich used the poor's tax dollars to send business their way and also used an accountant to find tax loopholes, and then demanded still a tax cut of which they feel entitled the greatest share.

But let's just settle this right here and now, shall we? Bring back classic economics, remove property and income taxes, and move solely to a sales tax that is graduated progressively, taxing items such as yachts at a much higher rate, for instance. Happy?

Good Ol' Boy said...

Peder, I was ready to say blow it out yer *ss until I read the last paragraph of your comment. I think you maybe "get it" but just don't know why.
I have never read an anology like this before, but it is perfect. It very well sums up the situation we find ourselves in. Congratulations again C.Y.

Eric J. Burton said...

C.Y where have you been?
I haven't seen any appearances from you lately?

Anonymous said...

Really busy at work w/schedule change , dog's need training, working on my Dad's stuff while he's in the nursing home all while trying to prevent divorce #2.

(the last one was sorta a joke - we had our 20th aniv on the 28th)

Eric J. Burton said...

You have the Hounds right?
I am on my way to Vegas on Saturday, I hope I don't lose too much money.

This snow stuff sucks I am glad it snowed so we will have water for the ducks this season however, I have no where to walk the dog because it is snowed in.

If I keep watching hockey I may be on divorce number one.